Technology Consulting

Systems integration and architecture review

We map every system and data flow, find where records are re-keyed, duplicated or lost, and recommend an integration design that one team can maintain.

A laptop showing code on a desk

Who it is for

Companies with several systems passing data through scripts, exports or point-to-point integrations.

Duration
Agreed on the first call
Price
Agreed in writing before we start
You receive
5 written deliverables
Can lead to
Integrations and custom software

The situation

An independent check of how your systems connect, before the next integration breaks

Orders, stock or invoices go missing between systems, and each fix is another script. Nobody can draw how data actually flows.

What you get

  • System and data-flow map, including the manual steps
  • List of failure points with their business impact
  • Target integration design: which system owns which record
  • Recommended tools and patterns, with build-or-buy notes
  • Phased plan to move from today to the target

What we need from you

  • Access to system admins and integration owners
  • A sample of recent integration errors or support tickets

If you go ahead

How the follow-on work runs

This engagement covers the first stages of the plan below. You decide whether to continue once you have the deliverables.

We pin down who uses the software, what they need to get done and what must be true on launch day.

What happens

  • Stakeholder interviews
  • User journey mapping
  • Requirement prioritisation

What you get

  • Prioritised requirements backlog

What we need from you

  • A product owner who can make decisions
  • Access to target users

Risk handled

Building features nobody asked for.

We design the key screens and put a clickable prototype in front of real users before any production code is written.

What happens

  • Wireframes
  • Clickable prototype
  • User testing

What you get

  • Tested prototype
  • UI specification

What we need from you

  • Feedback rounds within two working days

Risk handled

Discovering usability problems after the build.

We choose the stack, design the data model and agree the hosting and security approach.

What happens

  • Data model design
  • API contracts
  • Hosting and security plan

What you get

  • Architecture document
  • Data model

What we need from you

  • Hosting and compliance constraints

Risk handled

Expensive rewrites caused by early architectural shortcuts.

Two-week sprints, each ending in a working build you can use.

What happens

  • Feature development
  • Automated tests
  • Fortnightly demos

What you get

  • Working increments every two weeks

What we need from you

  • Product owner at each sprint demo and planning session

Risk handled

Surprises at the end of a long build.

Regression testing, performance checks and a security review before anything goes public.

What happens

  • Regression and device testing
  • Performance testing
  • Security review

What you get

  • QA report
  • Security findings and fixes

What we need from you

  • Sign-off on known issues accepted for launch

Risk handled

Launching with a vulnerability or a broken core flow.

Production deployment, monitoring and a planned rollback path.

What happens

  • Production deployment
  • Monitoring setup
  • Rollback plan

What you get

  • Live application
  • Operations runbook

What we need from you

  • Launch date and communication plan

Risk handled

A launch-day failure with no way back.

Fixes, small improvements and the next set of features based on real usage.

What happens

  • Issue fixing
  • Usage review
  • Roadmap sprints

What you get

  • Monthly release notes

What we need from you

  • Monthly roadmap review

Risk handled

Software decaying after launch.

Architecture & Integration Review

We use your details only to reply to this inquiry. See our privacy policy.

FAQ

Questions about this offer

Answered plainly, before you ask.

Ask us directly
We link most systems with Zapier and spreadsheets. Is that a problem?

Not always. The review shows which links are fine as they are and which carry enough volume or risk to need something sturdier.